Volatility Comparison of Dogecoin and Solana Using Historical Price Data Analysis for Enhanced Investment Strategies

Abstract

This study compares the volatility of two prominent cryptocurrencies, Dogecoin (DOGE) and Solana (SOL), using historical price data spanning five years from June 3, 2019, to June 3, 2024. By leveraging detailed daily trading information, the analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the risk profiles associated with each cryptocurrency. The methodology involves data preprocessing, exploratory data analysis (EDA), volatility calculation using 30-day rolling windows, and statistical testing, including two-sample t-tests and variance ratio tests. The findings indicate that both DOGE and SOL exhibit significant price variability, with SOL showing higher average prices and greater standard deviation compared to DOGE. For instance, the mean closing price for DOGE was $0.0875 with a standard deviation of $0.0941, while SOL had a mean closing price of $54.6754 and a standard deviation of $59.3020. Historical volatility trends reveal distinct patterns: DOGE’s volatility is primarily influenced by social media trends and speculative trading, whereas SOL’s volatility is driven more by technological advancements and market developments. The two-sample t-test results show no significant difference in the mean volatilities of DOGE and SOL (t-statistic: -0.8674, p-value: 0.3858), but the variance ratio test highlights that SOL’s volatility is significantly more variable than DOGE’s, with a variance ratio of 10.7028. These results suggest that while the average risk levels of DOGE and SOL are similar, their volatility behaviors differ significantly. For investors, understanding these distinct volatility characteristics is crucial for making informed decisions regarding asset allocation and risk management. The study's insights also provide valuable guidance for financial analysts and portfolio managers, emphasizing the importance of considering both average volatility and its variability when assessing the risk profiles of cryptocurrencies. Future research should explore the impact of external factors such as regulatory changes and macroeconomic events on cryptocurrency volatility and expand the analysis to include other digital assets and longer time periods. Incorporating high-frequency trading data and advanced econometric models could further enhance the accuracy of volatility predictions, offering deeper insights into the behavior of digital currencies under various market conditions